The Labeling Theory

When writing my appointee I recognise to provided my sympathiseing on labeling theory. The first article I choose base itself on how by dint of attaching labels to privates it changes societies perception of how physically mesmerizing they are. The author Kowner did a modification of studies to turn over if this theory was true. Kowner prove that non only did labels of aberration effect how sweet an individual was but an individuals sexuality and genial state were also considered. This leave me examinationing wether or not society did find deviants slight prepossessing which is a question I had not recognise myself asking previously when perusing labeling theory. I found myself feeling deeper into the lives of deviants whilst read this article and saw things from a different survey that hadnt already been shown to me. I discovered that when being taught somewhat labeling theory I am simply only asked to understand it. Never am I required to put myself in the position of the deviant and this was something that whilst reading through the article I had most definitely found. In particular, I discovered that in Japan where the experiment was based that the definition of deviance wide-ranging to what it is here in the UK.\n referable to this, many would question wether the bases of the take up are relevant or even reliable when move to understand how labeling theory effectuate those here in the UK. But, As always within sociology I find myself required to pure tone beyond what is asked of us and to see further meanings of the topic in question to greater my understanding. I thought it was extremely provoke that when trying to see if their possibility of deviants being less attractive the researchers asked students to look at a set of photos and to rate them gibe to their attractiveness. When doing so the researchers are comprehend if the students stereotypical view of soulfulness who is deemed to be deviant meaning that they are le ss attractive than someone who does not fulf...