The Murder Of Oneself :: essays research papers

<a href="http//www.geocities.com/vaksam/">surface-to-air missile Vaknins Psychology, Philosophy, Economics and Foreign Affairs Web SitesThose who believe in the finality of death (i.e., that there is no after-sprightliness) they are the ones who advocate suicide and impact it as a matter of personal choice. On the opposite hand, those who steadfastly believe in some form of existence after incarnate death they condemn suicide and judge it to be a major sin. Yet, ration all(prenominal)y, the situation should have been reversed it should have been easier for someone who believed in doggedness after death to terminate this phase of existence on the centering to the next. Those who faced void, finality, non-existence, vanishing should have been greatly deterred by it and should have refrained even from socialize the idea. Either the latter do not really believe what they dissemble to believe or something is wrong with rationality. One would tend to suspect the former. suicide is very different from ego sacrifice, avoidable martyrdom, engaging in life risking activities, refusal to prolong ones life through medical treatment, euthanasia, overdosing and self inflicted death that is the result of coercion. What is common to all these is the operational mode a death caused by ones own actions. In all these behaviours, a foreknowledge of the risk of death is present coupled with its acceptance. plainly all else is so different that they cannot be regarded as belonging to the selfsame(prenominal) class. Suicide is chiefly intended to terminate a life the other acts are aimed at perpetuating, strengthening and defending values. Those who commit suicide do so because they firmly believe in the finiteness of life and in the finality of death. They prefer termination to continuation. Yet, all the others, the observers of this phenomenon, are horrified by this preference. They abhor it. This has to do with out understanding of the meaning of life. Ultimately, life has totally meanings that we attribute and ascribe to it. Such a meaning can be external (Gods intend) or internal (meaning generated through arbitrary plectron of a frame of reference). But, in any case, it must be actively selected, adopted and espoused. The difference is that, in the case of external meanings, we have no way to judge their validity and quality (is Gods plan for us a mature one or not?). We just take them on because they are big, all encompassing and of a good source.