Community Psychology and Public Health Essay

This essay discusses the similarities and differences between two approaches federation psychological science and globe wellness that are related to well-disposed problems. Each rule approaches social problems differently however t here(predicate) are certain overlapping features. Each method also has its specific strengths and weaknesses. All of these factors allow for be discussed in this essay.Community psychology and everyday healthThe foundation of exoteric health rests on the practical put throughation of attempts to protect and improve a communitys health by applying preventative medicine, sanitary methods, and social science. The goal of exoteric health is to prevent disease and distress from occurring. And here is the first difference between creation health and community psychology. Where public health focuses on specific problems, community psychology focuses on the boilersuit quality of life of the individuals within a community.The goal of community psycholog y is to understand the relationships of the individual with his or her community and society through inquiry and to improve the individuals life through certain actions. The ideas that engage community psychology are inspiring and motivational, but the ideas have turn reveal to be difficult to put into action items in order to implement them. This is one of the weaknesses of community psychology and one of the causes of the many failed attempts at transforming a community.However, there are also cases of political factors obstructing the implementation of solutions to social problems, as described by Professor Albee in Guernina (1995, p. 85), and when Reagan was elected the message went out to the National Institute of Mental Health from the White House saying, We will no longer support any research into the social causes of mental illness we will only support research into the biological, genetic primitive causes. Thus it seems like community psychology is deemed the impracti cal, unnecessary approach that is in any case strikeed with sociology to make a practical impact on a community.In contrast, the public health approach, that highlights biological and engineering methods, has proven to effectively prevent various diseases and socially abusive behaviors from spreading widely. For example, under the public health regulations in South Africa, the management of kind waste in public places was determined and implemented during the 19th century.However, this approach isnt ameliorate either, because although the human waste was effectively managed in public places, the problem arose when human waste occurred in terms of intimate actions, such as clean and toilet hygiene. Neither of the approaches is perfect and both approaches have qualities that can potentially transform a community. In this sense, the merging of the outgo qualities of both approaches is best described by Gilbert, The close affinity between sociology and public health is in terms of unit of study, theory, and method.They share a common concern with populations of individuals, a theoretical orientation toward abstract generalisations and a similar methodological approach. They also share a problem focus. To a large finale public health problems are social problems. The social forces that determine whether a health condition will be viewed as a public health problem, are similar to those that define a social problem. (1995, p. 81) endingPublic health can do for a little more(prenominal) of the human touch as experienced in community psychology. And community psychology can benefit from the practical methods as seen in public health solutions. Fortunately this is happening in the socio-ecological approach, which is based on a holistic understanding of the individual, the community, diseases, and health as the outcome of the intricate behaviour patterns that are instilled in individuals and groups through socialization, and who then understand the ways as be ing normal.